Liberalscum Buster

December 30, 2007

Euthanaisia ? Those poor kids over there really never had a chance.

Filed under: BARACK OBAMA, Bush, life, mideast, news, politics, war — gasdocpol @ 4:04 pm

THAT IS ONE OF MY FAVORATE DUMB STATEMENTS. OTHERS INCLUDE:

GW Bush “They hate us for our freedom”

Rudolf Giuliani “Thank God George W. Bush is our President”

Mike Huckabee ” The Earth is 6000 years old and Evolution is just one theory”

John McCain “The surge is working” (Yeah but what about the political solution – no progress there.)

Hillary “If I had known then what I know now, I would not have voted for the war”

Bill Clinton “I was against the Iraq war from the beginning. I did not have sexual relations with that fiasco”

John Edwards ” My position is very clear. The time has come for decisive action to eliminate the threat posed by Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction. I’m a co-sponsor of the bipartisan resolution that is presently under consideration in the Senate. Saddam Hussein’s regime is a grave threat to America and our allies. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons today, that he’s used them in the past, and that he’s doing everything he can to build more. Every day he gets closer to his long-term goal of nuclear capability.

CONTRAST THE ABOVE WITH WHAT BARACK OBAMA SAID IN OCTOBER 2002.

” I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a US occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences. I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaeda.

I am not opposed to all wars. I’m opposed to dumb wars.

Not bad for a 46 year old young whippersnapper who never had tea with Prime Minister Bhutto.

December 29, 2007

HILLARY HAD TEA WITH PRIME MINISTER BHUTTO BUT VOTED FOR A DUMB WAR ANYWAY

Filed under: BARACK OBAMA, Bush, life, mideast, news, politics, war — gasdocpol @ 2:05 pm

EDWARDS AND KERRY ALSO VOTED FOR A DUMB WAR IN OCTOBER 2002.

WITH SEEMINGLY AMAZING FORESIGHT AND WISDOM, OBAMA VIGOROUSLY OPPOSED THE IRAQ INVASION in a speech
Delivered on 26 October 2002 at an anti-war rally in Chicago

“Good afternoon. Let me begin by saying that although this has been billed as an anti-war rally, I stand before you as someone who is not opposed to war in all circumstances.

The Civil War was one of the bloodiest in history, and yet it was only through the crucible of the sword, the sacrifice of multitudes, that we could begin to perfect this union, and drive the scourge of slavery from our soil. I don’t oppose all wars.

My grandfather signed up for a war the day after Pearl Harbor was bombed, fought in Patton’s army. He saw the dead and dying across the fields of Europe; he heard the stories of fellow troops who first entered Auschwitz and Treblinka. He fought in the name of a larger freedom, part of that arsenal of democracy that triumphed over evil, and he did not fight in vain.

I don’t oppose all wars.

After September 11th, after witnessing the carnage and destruction, the dust and the tears, I supported this Administration’s pledge to hunt down and root out those who would slaughter innocents in the name of intolerance, and I would willingly take up arms myself to prevent such a tragedy from happening again.

I don’t oppose all wars. And I know that in this crowd today, there is no shortage of patriots, or of patriotism. What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other arm-chair, weekend warriors in this Administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne.

What I am opposed to is the attempt by political hacks like Karl Rove to distract us from a rise in the uninsured, a rise in the poverty rate, a drop in the median income – to distract us from corporate scandals and a stock market that has just gone through the worst month since the Great Depression.

That’s what I’m opposed to. A dumb war. A rash war. A war based not on reason but on passion, not on principle but on politics.

Now let me be clear – I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. He has repeatedly defied UN resolutions, thwarted UN inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity.

He’s a bad guy. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him.

But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States, or to his neighbors, that the Iraqi economy is in shambles, that the Iraqi military a fraction of its former strength, and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history.

I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a US occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences. I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaeda.

I am not opposed to all wars. I’m opposed to dumb wars.

So for those of us who seek a more just and secure world for our children, let us send a clear message to the president today. You want a fight, President Bush? Let’s finish the fight with Bin Laden and al-Qaeda, through effective, coordinated intelligence, and a shutting down of the financial networks that support terrorism, and a homeland security program that involves more than color-coded warnings.

You want a fight, President Bush? Let’s fight to make sure that the UN inspectors can do their work, and that we vigorously enforce a non-proliferation treaty, and that former enemies and current allies like Russia safeguard and ultimately eliminate their stores of nuclear material, and that nations like Pakistan and India never use the terrible weapons already in their possession, and that the arms merchants in our own country stop feeding the countless wars that rage across the globe.

You want a fight, President Bush? Let’s fight to make sure our so-called allies in the Middle East, the Saudis and the Egyptians, stop oppressing their own people, and suppressing dissent, and tolerating corruption and inequality, and mismanaging their economies so that their youth grow up without education, without prospects, without hope, the ready recruits of terrorist cells.

You want a fight, President Bush? Let’s fight to wean ourselves off Middle East oil, through an energy policy that doesn’t simply serve the interests of Exxon and Mobil.

Those are the battles that we need to fight. Those are the battles that we willingly join. The battles against ignorance and intolerance. Corruption and greed. Poverty and despair.

The consequences of war are dire, the sacrifices immeasurable. We may have occasion in our lifetime to once again rise up in defense of our freedom, and pay the wages of war. But we ought not – we will not – travel down that hellish path blindly. Nor should we allow those who would march off and pay the ultimate sacrifice, who would prove the full measure of devotion with their blood, to make such an awful sacrifice in vain.”

HILLARY HAD TEA WITH BENAZIR BHUTTO BUT SHE STILL VOTED FOR THE IRAQ WAR

Filed under: BARACK OBAMA, Bush, life, mideast, news, politics, war — gasdocpol @ 1:34 am

OBAMA DID NOT HAVE TEA WITH BENAZIR BHUTTO BUT IN OCTOBER 2002 HE UTTERED THESE WORDS IN CHICAGO.

” I don’t oppose all wars.

After September 11th, after witnessing the carnage and destruction, the dust and the tears, I supported this Administration’s pledge to hunt down and root out those who would slaughter innocents in the name of intolerance, and I would willingly take up arms myself to prevent such a tragedy from happening again.

I don’t oppose all wars. And I know that in this crowd today, there is no shortage of patriots, or of patriotism. What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other arm-chair, weekend warriors in this Administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne.

What I am opposed to is the attempt by political hacks like Karl Rove to distract us from a rise in the uninsured, a rise in the poverty rate, a drop in the median income – to distract us from corporate scandals and a stock market that has just gone through the worst month since the Great Depression.

That’s what I’m opposed to. A dumb war. A rash war. A war based not on reason but on passion, not on principle but on politics.

Now let me be clear – I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. He has repeatedly defied UN resolutions, thwarted UN inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity.

He’s a bad guy. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him.

But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States, or to his neighbors, that the Iraqi economy is in shambles, that the Iraqi military a fraction of its former strength, and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history.

I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a US occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences. I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaeda.

I am not opposed to all wars. I’m opposed to dumb wars.

Hillary had tea with Benazir Bhutto and voted for a dumb war.

December 28, 2007

BHUTTO STUCK HER HEAD THROUGH THE SUN ROOF… SHE MIGHT AS WELL HAVE HAD A TARGET ON HER CHEST

Filed under: BARACK OBAMA, Bush, life, mideast, news, politics, war — gasdocpol @ 8:47 pm

SHE KNEW THAT SECURITY WAS INADAQUATE. SHE WAS CARRYING THE BAGGAGE OF GW BUSH’S IRAQ FIASCO.

But Hillary met her socially twice . Richardson wants Musharaff to step down. (Don’t hold your breath waiting for that to happen.)

Bush/Cheney tried to stick it in Musharaff’s ear by sending Bhutto in. Now they have no choice but to try to work with Musharaff.

McCain is going to offer the US’s help in a mess that helped to create by supporting Bush’s Iraq fiasco.

HILLARY MET PRIME MINISTER BHUTTO SOCIALLY…. BIG DEAL !!!

Filed under: BARACK OBAMA, Bush, life, mideast, news, politics, war — gasdocpol @ 8:24 pm

It did not seem to confer to Hillary any great insight regarding the impact of the preemptive US invasion of Iraq.

Hillary voted for the US invasion of an oil rich Arab country that did not attack the USA and was no danger to the USA.Hillary did nothing to stop the march to a war that she had supported.

When Bhutto returned to Pakistan, she carried the baggage of the US Iraq occupation that was the result of Hillary’s support of GW Bush’s Iraq war.

THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION HAD NEOCONS TOO.

Filed under: BARACK OBAMA, Bush, life, mideast, news, politics, war — gasdocpol @ 5:44 pm

TO HIS CREDIT, BILL CLINTON KEPT THEIR AGENDA FROM TAKING PLACE UNLIKE GW BUSH WHO LET THE WHITE HOUSE AGENDA BE TAKEN OVER BY THEM.

Original signitories of PNAC included : CIA Director James Woolsey and Madeliene Allbright.

MANY BAD THINGS HAVE RESULTED FROM THE IRAQ WAR THAT HILLARY VOTED FOR

Filed under: BARACK OBAMA, Bush, life, mideast, news, politics, war — gasdocpol @ 5:40 pm

THE IRAQ WAR HAS HAD ITS IMPACT ON PAKISTAN TOO. To the extent that Hillary enabled the Iraq war she is responsible for its consequences in Pakistan.

This is not to say that Hillary shares blame equally with Bush/Cheney and the Neocons.

HILLARY VOTED FOR THE IRAQ WAR BUT MET PRIME MINISTER BHUTTO SOCIALLY

Filed under: BARACK OBAMA, Bush, life, medicine, mideast, news, politics, war — gasdocpol @ 5:32 pm

OBAMA OPPOSED THE IRAQ INVASION, SHOWING GOOD JUDGEMENT.

Somehow, I feel good judgement in international affairs trumps social accessability.

HILLARY & McCAIN HAVE MET BHUTTO -SO WHAT?

Filed under: BARACK OBAMA, Bush, life, mideast, news, politics, war — gasdocpol @ 5:13 pm

A. BHUTTO IS DEAD AND B. BOTH McCAIN & HILLARY WERE INVOLVED IN GETTING US INTO THE IRAQ FIASCO WHICH IS THE MAIN SOURCE OF OUR PROBLEMS INTERNATIONALLY

GW Bush has hamhandedly tried to sabbotage Musharaff by sending in Bhutto without addaquat protection and incombered by the US Iraq policy. Now he is left to kiss up to Musharaff. That should work out real well. lol

Bill Richardson says we should tell Musharaff to step down. Riggghht that is going to happen.

The USA is still the most powerful country on Earth but it needs to clean up its act. Common sense and good judgement which Barack Obama has is our best chance for that to hallen.

December 27, 2007

HUCKLEBERRY HOUND THINKS THE EARTH IS 6000 YEARS OLD AND EVOLUTION IS ONLY ONE THEORY

Filed under: life, mideast, news, politics, RELIGION — gasdocpol @ 1:01 pm

HE DOES NOT KNOW MUCH ABOUT THE NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE ESTIMATE.

And he seems like such a nice guy- the kind of guy you would like to have a beer with.

Older Posts »

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.